Some Thoughts on Duplicate Content

So for the last week or two I’ve had some conversations with my friend Stace Barrus of SpyderCandy.com about duplicate content and what to worry about and what not to worry about.

You see, a lot of times we worry about having too much duplicate content out there on the web, that it will hurt our ranking in the search engines.  Well, after having some of these discussions I think there is a better way to look at it.

What is Duplicate Content

Here is a quick definition of duplicate content from the Google Webmaster Guidelines:

Duplicate content generally refers to substantive blocks of content within or across domains that either completely match other content or are appreciably similar.  Mostly, this is not deceptive in origin.

So if you have an article that you write and have it submitted to a bunch of different places, that is technically duplicate content on all of those other sites.  But is that necessarily a bad thing?  Wouldn’t it be good to have your article syndicated on multiple sites?

Or what if you take articles from other sites and publish them on your site?   That’s duplicate content too, right?  Well, yes it is.  So which do we really need to worry about the most?  Which one is the evil ‘duplicate content’ that everyone seems to refer to?

What Search Engines Want

Ok, let’s take a look at this from a search engine’s point of view.  What is a search engine trying to do?   Honestly, all they want to do is to give their users a good experience!  They want it to be so that when you go and do a search you get good results, and not the same thing over and over from multiple sites.   That’s the problem with duplicate content.

So what does a search engine do when they come across duplicate content that could show up in the search results?  They show what they think is the original or best result!

So with that in mind, let’s say that your article gets syndicated to a bunch of other sites.  What the search engines will try to do is show what they think is the original or best version of that article and not all the other versions.  That way, they give their users a good experience.

Articles and Syndication

So does syndication hurt you?  Well, again, think of it from a search engine point of view.  If you write good content and it gets syndicated, why should that hurt you?

Stace told me about a conversation he had with Stephen Spencer (founder and CEO of Netconcepts) at Blog World Expo.  He asked him this same question about articles and here is what Stephen Spencer told him (paraphrased of course):

All that happens is that the duplicate articles will be removed from the search results.  But, they still give you link benefit; they still pass ‘link-juice.’  They just don’t show up in the search results, only the original does.

In other words, get your articles syndicated, but don’t expect all of the duplicates out there to show up in the search results.

Article Spam

Now, that doesn’t mean you should go out there and spam your article across a million sites.  You see, there is a point where this type of syndication really can hurt you.  Google and other search engines do watch for malicious activities that are meant to deceive the search engines.  So don’t go crazy with your syndication.

Here’s what I’d recommend you do as a few practical steps when it comes to article submissions:

  1. Publish the article on your site first.
  2. Wait a few days before syndicating to let it get indexed first
  3. Submit the article to a handful of good article directories or other syndication outlets, but be reasonable.

By submitting the article to your site first you can help it be noticed as the original.  Also, it is a good idea to link back to the original when you syndicate, giving the search engines more reason to believe that it is the original.  For more info on that, read the first question and answer from this interview that Stephen Spencer had with Matt Cutts: Natural Search Tactics for Retailers.

Republishing Articles on Your Site

So what about taking articles from other places and putting them on your site?  Well, if you read what I’ve said above you’ll see that it probably isn’t the best idea because you are not the original content.  So don’t expect the articles you take from other sites to show up well in the search results.  I admit that in some cases I have had this type of article show up, but not very often.  You’ll do a lot better by creating your own content!

I’d love to hear anyone else’s thoughts on this! Share your thoughts in the comments section below!

Save for Later: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Technorati
  • Furl
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon

Related Posts

Onsite vs. Offsite SEO
Should Your Business Have a Blog Attached to the Site?
Meta Tag Guidelines
‘Blueprinting’ Your New Website
5 Ways to Get Ideas for Articles, Posts, and More!



25 Comments

SEO HarrogateOctober 1st, 2008 at 1:47 pm

Copyscape is a must when dealing with duplicate content

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

Thanks SEO Harrogate. Just in case for other readers, he’s referring to http://www.copyscape.com/

[Reply]

steve001October 2nd, 2008 at 2:01 am

people often use duplicate content to build up fast article for submissions and the interesting fact is that some websites accept these contents without anlysing them… i think hard rules should be drafted for internet plagiarisms….

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

Yeah, I don’t agree with doing plagiarism and constructing articles that way. Mainly what I’m referring to here is still writing your own content and then openly submitting those articles multiple places to get the link benefit.

[Reply]

CristianOctober 4th, 2008 at 2:43 am

On my G webmaster tools i have a warning about duplicate meta tags. What this means?

THank you,

http://www.carspartsforsale.com

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

Not sure, I haven’t seen that error before. Maybe you have your meta keywords in there twice? Anyone else know about this?

[Reply]

JillianOctober 5th, 2008 at 10:12 pm

It is not at all good to use duplicate content. Why don’t you go with your own words and statements. No one can better explain about your product/ website. It is you, who can do it perfectly. And it also fetches you good results.

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

Well said Jillian! I think that if all you do is use duplicate content you’re trying to take the easy way out, but don’t be surprised if that easy way out doesn’t work out too well. Stick with your own content.

The main point of this article was if you publish your own content elsewhere, don’t worry too much about it hurting your Google rankings.

[Reply]

JennyOctober 11th, 2008 at 5:31 pm

I would have to agree that duplicate content is not good. The only problem is, sometimes you have no control over it. If you write good enough then people will scrape your stuff and put it on their site. At that point, youd better hope you have more authority for your stuff, otherwise google will ding you for the dup penalty. :(

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

That’s exactly what I’m talking about, there really isn’t a penalty for that! If you stuff gets duplicated it’s not necessarily a bad thing. You just want to make sure that it’s your site that is the original.

[Reply]

JordansNovember 5th, 2008 at 3:29 pm

I was penalized by Google recently for duplicate content and I didnt even know I had that.. real blower, but everything is fine now.

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

How exactly were you penalized? Was it for having duplicate content on your site or on other sites?

[Reply]

Fancy Dress DesignerNovember 14th, 2008 at 5:17 am

So Google can penalise you for having duplicate content on your site even if someone has copied the information from you. I have heard that Google puts you in a sand box and there is no telling how long you will be there for.

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

the main ‘penalty’ here is that if you’re just using duplicate content you probably won’t show up well in the search results.

As for the sandbox, this mainly applies to new sites. It takes awhile for the rankings to start to come in.

[Reply]

BitStar SoftwareNovember 16th, 2008 at 3:56 am

What do you think of duplicate content on the same site? In applications we code sometimes the same content can be reached from several different urls. This is simply because of the dinamic nature of the web site. We can’t prevent that (at least not easily). What is your recommendation here?

[Reply]

Dan Reply:

Well, part of that will depend on how dynamic the site is. If you’re talking about dynamic URLs with a lot of variables and such you probably don’t have to worry about it since the spiders probably won’t be able to follow it anyway. The other option is to have a robots.txt file that says not to pick up those pages.

[Reply]

Home BrewerFebruary 2nd, 2009 at 12:53 pm

If you wrote 10 different articles on a subject (all original and unique content) and submitted them each to 10 different article submission sites with links back to your site, do you think you might get penalized? I’d like to use article marketing, but obviously, I don’t want to get slapped by Google.

[Reply]

Annika, sista minuten resorFebruary 19th, 2009 at 11:35 am

The duplicate content filter is sometimes hard on sites that don’t intend to spam the search engines. But it is ultimately up to you to help the search engines determine that your site is as unique as possible. By using the tools in this article to eliminate as much duplicate content as you can, you’ll help keep your site original and fresh.

[Reply]

SEO BrightonMarch 18th, 2009 at 12:37 am

Excellent idea for copywriting, copywriting is the best search engine marketing, rich content for keywords information is useful to all.

[Reply]

3xpApril 27th, 2009 at 9:55 am

Okay - I have an issue with one thing that you have said over and over. It is not Always the “original” author that has their “copy” of the article at the top of the search engines. If I have an obscure website and a PR of 0 and a site with a PR4 picks it up and they are more authoritative on the subject than I am, then they may well be the ones that show up higher in the serps for that article than I do.

[Reply]

Scott GardnerJune 5th, 2009 at 9:23 am

Duplicate content is always something to contend with - especially when using article syndication as part of your overall marketing campaign. Still, I agree with you that it isn’t worrisome enough to stop distributing articles. The linking benefits make it worthwhile. I think the key is making sure the content on your site is 100% original and then write separate articles for distributing.

[Reply]

RyanzJune 19th, 2009 at 6:25 am

few day ago I heard that leading search engines will go for duplicate contents in form of archive.

[Reply]

TechTipsJune 24th, 2009 at 4:30 am

nice points.

[Reply]

Irene SavoiaJuly 6th, 2009 at 9:01 pm

What you say on “what is duplicate content” is insightful.It is worth sharing here.

[Reply]

haber scriptiDecember 7th, 2009 at 9:51 am

Hi, thank you very much. for sharing…

[Reply]

Leave a comment

Your comment

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word

NOTE: I reserve the right to edit your comment if I feel it necessary.